Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Reply to Power Rankings (49ers)


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Reply to Power Rankings (49ers)
Permalink   


You're right about Dennis Erickson. He is a bad NFL coach, who has no business coaching in this league. He had no business even getting hired.


However, the 49ers have so many problems beyond Erickson. I talked to Ira Miller, who covers the 49ers for the San Francisco Chronicle. He said that the 49ers have really screwed up in past drafts and have problems economically, they cant generate extra money because they don't have many private boxes in their old stadium. They need a new stadium, but they don't know where the money is going to come from. Add in that John York, the owner of the 49ers, is considered a joke by unnamed owners in the league, and you have a franchise in disarray.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

When you say problems ecomomically, do you mean cap-wise?



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I mean both the cap and regular money. They are not in a good financial situation.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

How could they be? They have about ummm... 0 talented players. They must have gone all out on players that have already left.


Can you please explain the salary cap to me? The way I understand it is, you have so much money to spend, and if you release a player, you still have to pay off their contract, if you trade a player you lose that player's contract and get the player you traded for's contract. Is that all there is to it?



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

When players get signing bonuses, the amount of money in the bonus is dispersed throughout the life of the contract, while the player gets the money straight up. Here is an example:


Let's say Joe Smith signs a 5 year contract for $19 million and a $10 million signing bonus.


Smith gets $10 mil up front, as well as $3.8 per year. However, his cap hit for each season is $3.8 + $2 ($10 mill bonus/5 years = $2 mil/year) = $5.8 mil


Signing bonuses are made so players get the money right away and the team doesnt have to take a huge cap hit.


Now, lets say Joe Smith is a bust after his first year and totally sucks. The team decides to release him. The team has to take a cap hit of the amount of money thats left on the signing bonus dispersal. After 1 year, $2 mil of the $10 mil bonus is paid off, which means the team will have $8 mil charged to the cap the year he is released. Sucks to pay $8 mil for a player not on the team. That same rule applies when u trade a player. You have to take the cap hit.



-- Edited by Walter at 14:03, 2004-12-15

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I forgot to mention that teams can pay off the bonus any way they want to. The preferred structure is moving most of the money toward the end of the contract.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

I kinda get it. Am I right about the trade part of it?

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Well, sort of.


If you trade Joe Smith for John Brown, you have to pay of Smith's signing bonus, which I said in my last post.


However, you do not have to pay Smith's yearly salary. The team u traded him to has to pay that off per year.


Instead, you have to pay off Brown's yearly salary, but you do not have to take the salary cap hit. The team that traded him does.


That's why players are rarely traded for each other in the NFL. Both teams take cap hits.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

Thank you it is much clearer now.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard