Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: College Football Pick-'em: Week 8


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
College Football Pick-'em: Week 8
Permalink   


Louisiana-Lafayette over Florida Atlantic
Virginia over North Carolina
Bowling Green over C. Michigan
Utah over New Mexico
#4 West Virginia over Connecticut
#1 Ohio State over Indiana
#5 Texas over #17 Nebraska
#6 Louisville over Syracuse
#21 Wisconsin over Purdue
Northwestern over Michigan State
Maryland over NC State
Penn State over Illinois
#15 Arkansas over Mississippi
Georgia over Mississippi State
Miami, FL over Duke
#24 Missouri over Kansas State
Ohio over Buffalo
Ball State over W. Michigan
#8 Auburn over Tulane
#10 Notre Dame over UCLA
Arizona State over Stanford
SMU over East Carolina
South Carolina over Vanderbilt
BYU over UNLV
Toledo over E. Michigan
Kansas over Baylor
Northern Illinois over Temple
#2 Michigan over Iowa
#7 Tennessee over Alabama
#11 Cal over Washington
Florida State over #22 Boston College
Iowa State over Texas Tech
Minnesota over North Dakota State
TCU over Army
UCF over Rice
Wyoming over Colorado State
#16 Oregon over Washington State
#18 Boise State over Idaho
#19 Rutgers over Pittsburgh
Akron over Miami, OH
#20 Oklahoma over Colorado
UAB over Marshall
Arizona over Oregon State
UTEP over Houston
Virginia Tech over Southern Miss
Lousiana Tech over Utah State
Mid Tenn State over Louisiana-Monroe
Nevada over San Jose State
#23 Texas A&M over Oklahoma State
Arkansas State over North Texas
#12 Clemson over #13 Georgia Tech
Air Force over San Diego State
Hawaii over New Mexico State
Tulsa over Memphis
#14 LSU over Fresno State
South Florida over Cincinnati



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I like the Northwestern pick. I think Michigan State has give up on John L. Smith.

Cal is my Double Money Pick this week. They're on fire, and Washington's starting QB is out.

I'm torn about Rutgers and Pitt. On one hand, Rutgers has no passing game. On the other, Pitt has Dave Wannstedt as its coach. It's anyone's game to lose.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

That pick was kind of a toss up for me as well but I just made my decision based on the fact that Pitt lost to Michigan State! Wannstedt chokes again.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I have a feeling Pitt is going to jump out to a lead, but Wannstedt's conservative game plan will let Rutgers back into it. That's what happened against Michigan State; the Panthers actually had a 10-0 lead in that game.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

I couldn't agree with you more. Frank Caliendo said something funny about that last year on the Fox pregame show. He was doing a Jim Rome impersonation and he said something like "What Pennslvania High School are you eyeing for your next job, Dave?"

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I didn't watch the whole game, so I don't know if Dave Wannstedt did anything wrong specifically. But I'm not surprised that Rutgers was allowed to improve to 7-0.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 370
Date:
Permalink   

Miami almost lost to duke.FIRE COKER

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

I agree completely that Miami should fire Coker immediately.


Pitt isn't going to fire Wannstedt this year since Pitt is going to finish with a winning record but I think they should have fired him last year. He took over a team that was in a BCS bowl game the previous year and had a losing record with them.



-- Edited by Joey at 12:58, 2006-10-22

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Yeah, I don't think they fire Dave Wannstedt just yet. But just wait for all of his blunders next year when he coaches a team with an inexperienced quarterback.

Coker must go. Miami needs to bring Butch Davis back.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink   

I actually like Dave Wannstedt. I don't think he should of received as much blame as he did with the Dolphins.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

Year-in and Year-out Miami was one of the most, if not the most, talented teams in the NFL and year-in and year-out they either had a quick exit in the playoffs or they didn't make the playoffs at all. Wannstedt is horrible.



-- Edited by Joey at 16:40, 2006-10-23

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I agree. Wannstedt's teams perennially underachieve every year. He is not a good coach whatsoever.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink   

I disagree.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

Under Wannstedt, the Dolphins over-achieved in 2000 before underachieving every year after that. A competent coach would have at least taken a team that talented to the AFC Championship game once. Like I said, he did a pretty solid job in 2000 but in 2001 they lost a home wildcard game to a Ravens team that had no offense whatsoever. The next year, the Dolphins didn't even make the playoffs, losing the division to the less talented Jets. In '03 he missed the playoffs yet again while less talented teams like the Broncos and Ravens made it in. He was horrible.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

The Dolphins had one of the best teams in the NFL for a number of years, and they either fell short in the playoffs, or failed to reach the postseason all together. Remember that Week 17 game in New England in 2002? Miami blew an 11-point lead in the final two minutes when all it had to do was win a game against the then 8-7 Pats.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink   

I disagree.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

2002 was like the year of the choke. The Chargers choked, the Saints choked and the Dolphins choked. I bet it would have been pretty frustrating for me if I was a fan of one of those teams but it made for one exciting year in the NFL.


Why do you disagree?



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

The Saints choke was disgusting. They needed to win one single game against the 6-10 Vikings, 2-14 Bengals and 7-9 Panthers. They blew all three.

Also, the Browns and Giants choked in the playoffs when each of them had huge leads.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 116
Date:
Permalink   

I disagree.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Care to expound on what you disagree with?

-- Edited by Walter at 09:09, 2006-10-27

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard