Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: New 2005 NFL Projections


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
New 2005 NFL Projections
Permalink   


AFC East          AFC North          AFC South           AFC West                
1. NYJ 14-2       1. CIN 11-5        1. HOU 12-4        1. SD 13-3
2. NE 13-3        2. PIT 10-6         2. JAX 10-6         2. KC 7-9
3. BUF 7-9        3. BAL 6-10        3. IND 9-7           3. DEN 7-9
4. MIA 2-14      4. CLE 5-11         4. TEN 3-13        4. OAK 3-13


NFC East           NFC North           NFC South           NFC West
1. NYG 12-4       1. DET 10-6        1. NO 13-3           1. ARZ 10-6
2. DAL 11-5        2. CHI 8-8          2. ATL 8-8           2. STL 8-8
3. PHI 10-6        3. MIN 5-11         3. CAR 8-8          3. SEA 5-11
4. WAS 8-8        4. GB 3-13          4. TB 2-14           4. SF 2-14


 


WILDCARD ROUND


Philadelphia @ Detroit: 34-21 Philadelphia
New England @ Cincinnati: 27-3 New England
Dallas @ Arizona: 28-13 Dallas
Pittsburgh @ Houston: 16-13 (OT) Pittsburgh


DIVISIONAL PLAYOFFS


Dallas @ New York Giants: 26-24 New York Giants
New England @ San Diego: 34-13 New England
Philadelphia @ New Orleans: 45-37 New Orleans
Pittsburgh @ New York Jets: 16-13 (OT) New York Jets


CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIPS


New York Giants @ New Orleans: 35-20 New Orleans
New England @ New York Jets: 17-16 New England


SUPER BOWL XL


New Orleans v.s New England: 38-3 New England



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Minnesota goes 5-11 even though they will be trading cancer for defense and they have $30 million in cap space?


Houston wins the AFC South despite all of their needs and very little cap space? I think the Jags win the South going away.


Dallas 11-5 with Vinny Testaverde?


I agree the Packers will not make the playoffs next year, but 3-13? Do you think Favre will retire?


I think the Panthers will be back and will win the NFC South.


I agree Arizona will win the NFC West.


You never know what can happen in free agency and the draft. I'll be making my season previews in May, June and July again.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

I know these are definetly not official, but there is no real NFL news, so Im just doing this fun.


I think Culpepper will become a merely OK QB when they lose Moss, and Tice is an awful coach, also teams that change ownership during a year usually are bad that year.


After reading your offseason needs page, I do believe that the Jags win the South. But if the Colts retain Edgerrin James, then I say they do compete with the Jags and at the least make the playoffs instead of the Steelers. But right now, Im thinking that Edge is leaving


Bill Parcells never said we were keeping Vinny, Jerry Jones said we were keeping Vinny, Vinny will not be the Cowboys quarterback next year, Drew Bledsoe is, and I hear we may be keeping our draft pick and him. But if we keep Vinny, I will change my pick to us being dead last in the NFC East.


I do think Favre retires, and the Packers have an extremely difficult schedule. Packers will finish 3-13.


I cant say more than I already have I think the Saints win.


Seattle is losing Hasselbeck and Alexander, St. Louis has Mike Martz, and the other team is San Fransisco. Enough said. Arizona wins the NFC West easily enough that they throw a few games at the end of the season.


After another disappointing last place finish, Joe Gibbs will retire next year making the Skins officially the worst team in the NFC East for a long time.



-- Edited by Joey at 15:53, 2005-02-15

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I can buy what you're saying about the Vikings. You never know with that team and that coach.


The Colts will competitive with the Jaguars. It wouldn't be surprising for me to see either team win the South. But, I do think Jacksonville will sweep Indianapolis.


I was looking at Giants 12-4, and I can somehow believe that. Eli Manning improved a lot over the few games he played. If the Eagles succumb to the Super Bowl Loser curse, the G-Men could win the NFC East.


If Favre retires, the Packers are going to be terrible. I do think J.T. O'Sullivan will be a decent quarterback, so I'd give them a 5-11 record.


I think the Seahawks will lose Alexander, but I don't think they are going to part with Hasselbeck. They may franchise him now that they resigned Walter Jones to a seven-year deal.


 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

If they retain Hasselbeck I could see them winning one or two more games but thats it. Hasselbeck can be really good or really bad, and on the really bad days, sometimes they find a way to win because of the running game. They cant do that anymore. Seattle will be terrible without a running game.


I also could see Jacksonville sweeping Indy, but I could also see Indy sweeping Jacksonville. AFC South is the toughest division to pick by far.


Gosh, NFC West is terrible. Why arent the Rams or Cards or Seahawks spending huge money this off season all of these teams are below average, but the 49ers are below having any chance. I think they might not make the playoffs for about 12 years,



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Hasselbeck makes the occasional bonehead throw, but most quarterbacks do. But, Hasselbeck's stats are greatly affected by all of the dropped passes by his horrible receivers.


I think there is a greater chance that Jacksonville sweeps Indy than vice versa. The Jags dominated the Colts in both games this year. It will probably be some sort of split though.


The 49ers' organization is terrible. You're right... they probably won't see the post-season light for more than a dozen years.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

I agree, but that doesnt make any difference they still will have the dropped passes because Mike Holmgren isnt smart enough to aquire any good Wideouts. Seattle is dead if they lost Alexander.


Youre right it will probably be a split.


If anyone dominated the Colts dominated both games. It took a Touchdown at the end for Jacksonville to win in Indy, and how can you say the Jags dominated the first game. The Colts had the lead all day long.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I watched the first game, and I will say that Jacksonville partially dominated Indianapolis. What I mean by that is, the Jaguars' defense gave Manning lots of problems, and the Colts were able to maintain two truly successful drives the entire game. At that point in the season, Leftwich and the offense were still trying to find themselves, and they could not consistently score against Indy, which is the only reason why they lost.


The second time they played, the Jaguars were able to put points on the board. Their defense continued to frustrate Manning, and if you remember, that was the game when Manning and Reggie Wayne got into a shoving match. Jacksonville's defense has the Colts offense's number. 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

I dont know what game you were watching because the Colts scored with relative ease.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Which game are you talking about? The Colts had more stalled drives in that game than they had all year, excluding the Patriots playoff game.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

The First game. Colts moved the ball down field and every time the Jaguars got in striking distance the Colts marched down again. That game was never in Jacksonville's hands.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

No, that's the one I watched. The Colts struggled all day long to put togther consistent drives. In fact, Indy managed just three the entire game.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

For a game against Jacksonville 3 truly successful drives are damn good. It doesnt change the fact that the Colts dominated the first game and your a fool if you think they didnt.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

You mean: "YOU'RE a fool" (not: your a fool)


Having three successful drives in an entire game and winning by only seven does not constitute domination.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

Listen I live in Texas. English is not the subject of choice around here.


Every time Jacksonville got close Indy put it back up again that constitutes domination.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Jacksonville only lost because their inept (at the time) offense failed to convert a few fourth-and-one situations. The Jaguars dominated the Colts because they were one of the few teams this year that actually contained that explosive offense.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

What do you mean the Jaguars dominated the Colts? It was split and as I have said if anyone the Colts dominated.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Because no team in the NFL, excluding New England, held Indianapolis' offense in check like the Jaguars did. No team. They only lost the first time because their offense was going through some growing pains and couldn't convert a few key short yardage situations.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

Yet the Colts won, and then they almost won again.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

And convincingly they won the first time, I dont care what you say.



-- Edited by Joey at 08:18, 2005-03-16

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

You could also say the Jaguars won the second time and nearly won the first time. You have to agree that Jacksonville played the Colts better than any team this year, other than the Pats.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

No I dont, Kansas City dominated the Colts, Minnesota played them tougher, and San Diego. Jacksonville was not all that impressive against the Colts.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Kansas City caught Indianapolis off-guard because they had motives for revenge. If they played again in 2004, I think the Colts would have beaten them.


Minnesota played a close game with Indianapolis, but I never had a doubt in my mind that the Colts would win that game.


San Diego dominated the Colts. I forgot about that. Unfortunately for San Diego, they suffered a collosal meltdown in the fourth quarter.


I thought the Jaguars' defense was very impressive against one of the best offenses in the history of the NFL.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard