Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Bears


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Bears
Permalink   


I am really impressed with this team. They're only surrendering an average of 7 points per game while their offense is putting up points too! With the current state of the NFC, I think right now they are the easy favorites to go to the Super Bowl and they'll probably win there too right now. They're not one-dimensional anymore.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 370
Date:
Permalink   

The Bears have a great shot at going 14-2 and Home field advantage thru the playoffs.

The only challenge for them the rest of the season is the patriots and perhaps the giants.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I think the Eagles could pose a threat. Donovan McNabb always plays well in Soldier Field (he's from Chicago), and no matter whom the Eagles are playing, they always seem to put up 17-24 points.

By the way, isn't it weird that the Eagles have won all of their games by 14 points? They beat Houston, Green Bay, San Francisco and Dallas by that margin.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

I think 15-1 for the Bears with their lone loss coming to New England and Tom Brady. Eerily similar to the '85 Bears, whose only loss came to Miami and Dan Marino.


I dont think the Eagles are making the NFC Championship Game. I think they'll be the 5th seeded wildcard and win in St. Louis in the first round and lose to us in the second, then we go to Chicago for the NFC Championship and, at least if Bledsoe is still our quarterback, we get our ass kicked.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

You still think the Cowboys are going that far with Drew Bledsoe? I can't disagree more. Cowboys will be one-and-done in the postseason as long as Bledsoe is the starting quarterback.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

12-4 still. Our next two games are at home against Houston and New York and although New York is a good team I dont think we would lose to them at home. @ Carolina is a game that we will probably lose so now we're 4-3. @ Washington will be a tough one, but I think that either the Redskins or Giants- one of those two teams we will sweep. Probably the Redskins are the team that we'll sweep so I'll say 5-3. @ Arizona looked like a hard game before the season started but now it will be a laugh-in. 6-3. Now we come home and face a Colts team that barely beat Tennessee this week after we beat them 45-14 the week before. We'll use the same gameplan as the Titans, only we won't find a way to lose the same way bad teams like the Titans do. 7-3. v.s. Bucs on Turkey Day is easy. 8-3. As aforementioned, we'll sweep either Washington or New York and I think it'll be Washington so we lose this one to fall to 8-4. v.s. Saints is a game we should win. 9-4. @ Atlanta will be tough but I think we're the better team and we'll prevail (by now Romo should probably be playing). 10-4. v.s. Philly for the NFC East and I think we win, then we beat Detroit the next week to get to 12-4.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

I don't think the Cowboys will beat the Colts. And Dallas has always had a problem playing in Arizona. I think 10-6, with a shot at 11-5.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

I really can't see us losing to Arizona or Indianapolis. The Colts just beat Tennessee 14-13 after we beat them 45-14. No way we lose to Indianapolis, and I doubt that we will lose to Arizona.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

You're focused on just one week. The Colts also beat the Jaguars, who took you guys down in Week 1.

And given Dallas' poor history in Arizona, I think the Cardinals come away with a victory.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

The Jags win over us was hardly dominant though, if we played them at home then there's no doubt in my mind we would have won and we would have won by more than the Colts won by.


That poor record in Arizona doesn't mean anything anymore. We haven't played there since 2002 and although they were in the NFC West by then, we were still practically division rivals since we were only one year removed. Dont forget, Chan Gailey and Dave Campo were our head coaches as at that time. Despite his shortcomings lately, Parcells is a thousand times better than either of those two goofs. That was back in a whole other era, its a meaningless stat. A more meaningful stat is that under Parcells we are 2-0 against 'Zona.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

2-0 vs. 'Zona at home. Not on the road. I think it has to do with the Cardinals players getting mad that the Cowboys fans take their stadium by storm. So, they play extra hard to beat Dallas.

Dave Campo and Chan Gailey are gone, but so are Vince Tobin and Dave McGinnis. Dennis Green is also better than those two.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

Not in Arizona he hasn't been. Bill Parcells has been better than the Cowboys dinamic duo though. We should beat Arizona easily.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Date:
Permalink   

Joey wrote:

The Jags win over us was hardly dominant though, if we played them at home then there's no doubt in my mind we would have won and we would have won by more than the Colts won by.


That poor record in Arizona doesn't mean anything anymore. We haven't played there since 2002 and although they were in the NFC West by then, we were still practically division rivals since we were only one year removed. Dont forget, Chan Gailey and Dave Campo were our head coaches as at that time. Despite his shortcomings lately, Parcells is a thousand times better than either of those two goofs. That was back in a whole other era, its a meaningless stat. A more meaningful stat is that under Parcells we are 2-0 against 'Zona.





YOU MAD THAT THE COWBOYS SUCK

-- Edited by PanthersSuck at 22:16, 2006-10-14

-- Edited by PanthersSuck at 10:08, 2006-10-15

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Why would he be mad that the Steelers suck?

Chris Berman just mentioned the Cardinals game on Sunday NFL Countdown. Remember, that's the third straight road game for Dallas.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

The Cowboys suck huh? I guess that's why we're in the Top 10 in both offense and defense, why we beat a team that nearly beat the Colts and did beat the Redskins 45-14, I guess that's why we've outscored our opponents 147-92, and I guess that's why we very easily could have beaten the Eagles in a game they absolutely had to win. But other than that, I guess we suck.


So, the Panthers suck, the Cowboys suck and judging from your reaction to my prediction for the Redskins to beat the Jags (which came true) I guess you think the Redskins suck too. Answer me this, are there any teams that don't suck?



-- Edited by Joey at 18:02, 2006-10-15

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

The Cowboys definitely don't suck, but they're still not going far in the playoffs with Drew Bledsoe. He was horrible against Houston, even though the Cowboys blew them out.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Date:
Permalink   

Joey wrote:

The Cowboys suck huh? I guess that's why we're in the Top 10 in both offense and defense, why we beat a team that nearly beat the Colts and did beat the Redskins 45-14, I guess that's why we've outscored our opponents 147-92, and I guess that's why we very easily could have beaten the Eagles in a game they absolutely had to win. But other than that, I guess we suck.


So, the Panthers suck, the Cowboys suck and judging from your reaction to my prediction for the Redskins to beat the Jags (which came true) I guess you think the Redskins suck too. Answer me this, are there any teams that don't suck?



-- Edited by Joey at 18:02, 2006-10-15





yea the jags

now answer me this

do you have a life
1,200 posts on a board where like 5 people post.....GET OUT OF THE HOUSE...THERES REAL PEOPLE OUT THERE

-- Edited by PanthersSuck at 13:46, 2006-10-16

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 370
Date:
Permalink   

whatever "pantherssuck" you need to leave.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

You're telling someone they don't have a life for posting on a board, even though you're posting on the same board. Hmmm....

Pennington2Coles, he's just trying to get a reaction out of someone.

But he's right, the Jaguars don't suck.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 10
Date:
Permalink   

Walter wrote:

You're telling someone they don't have a life for posting on a board, even though you're posting on the same board. Hmmm....

Pennington2Coles, he's just trying to get a reaction out of someone.

But he's right, the Jaguars don't suck.




Hmmm.......
Maybe if you can read it says 1200 posts on a board where like 5 people post, not just for posting.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1421
Date:
Permalink   

Only in my 1,200 posts on this board I have actually had something to say. In your posts, all you do is critisize someone who posts on the board or go on a pointless rant saying that a team "sucks". I guess you only post here because you don't have anything better to do. Hmmmm......

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1789
Date:
Permalink   

Who cares whether it's 1200 or 5? We have good discussions on here.

I just don't understand what you gain by coming on here and criticizing people for no apparent reason.

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard